|
FAQ - Frequently Asked Questions
Air and Fuel System Questions
Have a question you'll like to see answered that's not
here? Click
here to email us.
-
I want more power and
the engine is detonating! Do I need to run richer to eliminate the knock?
What is the optimum air-fuel ratio to run for best power?
I've heard racers say that we need to run a bit lean for best power - is
this true?
- I've looked at my
scan tool and I see the AF ratio is 10.9:1. What's this mean?
- What does the
honeycomb screen in the throttle body do? Should I take it out?
- So
should I use an adjustable fuel pressure regulator or not?
- I want more
power! Should I put bigger injectors on my car?
- What is the injector
size on the L67 engines, and how much HP can they support?
- You've mentioned
injector on time, or BPW (Base Pulse Width). What's the max
number?
- So what's going to
happen if I stick bigger injectors on my GTP right now?
- But I've heard / seen this GTP
owner that swears he's running faster with larger
injectors. How's he doing this?
- I hear a lot about
knock or detonation or pre-ignition. What is this, and why is it
so bad?
- So how is knock or
detonation controlled? What is Knock Retard?
- Why can't I just
run smaller and smaller pulleys and keep increasing boost, and
therefore, power?
Home
1. I want more power and
the engine is detonating! Do I need to run richer to eliminate the knock?
What is the optimum air-fuel ratio to run for best power?
I've heard racers say that we need to run a bit lean for best power - is
this true?
Maybe.
It's somewhat true that running a tad bit richer will help quench
detonation (knock), but only to a certain extent. The stochiometric
AF ratio for gasoline is 14.7:1. Stochiometric means that at this
point, the fuel is completely burned with no unburned hydrocarbons left,
giving you best emissions. This is the AF ratio the PCM is shooting
for under idle and cruise.
However,
best power is achieved for gasoline at around 12.5:1, leaving excess
unburned hydrocarbons, but no unused oxygen molecules! (This is why
12.5:1 is typically the best power point.) So under
ideal circumstances, the best power AF ratio to shoot for is around 12:1
to 12.5:1. However, running a tad bit richer will throw excess fuel
(gasoline) into the combustion chamber, and the extra unburnt fuel
actually acts as a heat sink, absorbing heat and cooling the combustion
temperature, hence reducing the tendency for detonation to develop.
However, this only helps to a certain extent. If you're knocking
severely, you can throw all the raw fuel you want into the mix and it
won't quench the detonation.
When
you run richer than 12:1 on gasoline, you're losing power. Between
11:1 and 12:1, the power curve is fairly flat and you're not losing very
much power, much richer than about 10.5:1 and you're starting to lose
power drastically, and probably not helping your detonation problem
either.
So the answer is
to achieve around 11:1 AF ratio for your best compromise, not going richer
than about 10.5:1 at most. You won't be inherently down very much on
power due to the AF ratio, but you're probably delaying the onset of
detonation enough so that your spark advance isn't being severely
retarded, thus helping your power - end result, you get the optimum power
/ knock control balance.
When
racers speak of running on the "rich" side they're really
referring to running around 10.5:1 area, whereas when they speak of
running on the "lean" side, they're really referring to the
12.5:1 area, whether they know it or not. They're not actually
running "lean" (which would be something greater than 14.7:1),
they're just running on the "lean" side of best power.
2.
I've
looked at my scan tool and I see the AF ratio is 10.9:1. What's this
mean?
This is
the COMMANDED or DESIRED AF ratio, not the actual AF ratio that is
achieved. If everything is accurate (i.e. the MAF reading is
accurate, the fuel pressure is exactly at the factory calibrated level,
and the injector flow rate is as calibrated) then this commanded or
desired AF ratio will be exactly what is actually achieved. As you
can see, the PCM is already commanding the AF ratio to be on the rich side
for the best compromise between power and detonation avoidance as
explained in question 4 above.
3.
What
does the honeycomb screen in the throttle body do? Should I take it
out?
The
function of the honeycomb is to create a laminar flow across the entire
surface of the throttle body, so that air flow is uniform and
homogenous. The MAF sensing element is "spot checking" the
airflow in one spot inside this area, and for accurate airflow
measurement, the airflow in this spot should not be high or low relative
to the rest of the area. Without the honeycomb, turbulence could
make that spot reading inaccurate. What you don't know is whether
it's skewing the reading higher or lower. If higher, it'll make the
engine run rich. Lower, and she'll run lean.
4. So
should I use an adjustable fuel pressure regulator (AFPR) or not?
Again,
that depends. You've understood from the previous questions the
importance of getting the AF ratio right, and that the factory commanded
10.9:1 is already optimum. So, why would you ever want to adjust the
fuel pressure? In a properly functioning system where all parameters
and measurements are accurate, you don't! It all depends on whether
or not the MAF (Mass Airflow Sensor) is accurately measuring the amount of
air the engine is using! From the factory, the MAF system is deadly
accurate. However, if you've a altered throttle body / MAF unit, it
probably isn't accurate anymore. Also, if you've taken the honeycomb
screen out of the throttle body, you may have made the system inaccurate
as well as stated above. So how does a AFPR help? Since your
MAF may be reading the airflow inaccurately, your engine is either flowing
more or less air than the MAF reads. The fuel delivery is assuming
accurate airflow measurement, so if the MAF is wrong, you'll need to
"trick" the system and adjust your fuel delivery to match your
airflow. The simplest way to do this is to adjust the fuel
pressure.
Bottom
line, if you've messed around with the throttle body / MAF, you MAY need an adjustable fuel pressure regulator. However, NOBODY can give
you a recommendation on what pressure to run! This all depends on
your car, and how the MAF reading is skewed. Remember, you don't
necessarily have to increase the pressure at all! If the MAF is
skewed to read too much air (i.e. too rich), you'll need to decrease the
pressure for optimum performance.
Here's
the formula to calculate actual change in fuel flow for a given change in
fuel pressure:
For
example, if you increase your fuel pressure from 52 psi to 55 psi, the
square root of 55/52 is 1.028, meaning you've increased your fuel
FLOW 1.028 times, or 2.8%, not much at all. |
Of
course, changing the fuel pressure is at best, a band-aid to the
problem. The best way to address the problem is to correct the root
cause, which is the accuracy of the MAF. Any MAF inaccuracies will
be non-linear, meaning it may be 10% off at a lower RPM, but at higher
RPMs it may be 20% off, just for example. By tweaking the fuel
pressure, you can only optimize the system for one RPM, not the whole
range. Given a correct MAF calibration across the entire RPM
range, there is no need for tweaking the fuel pressure.
5. I want more
power! Should I put bigger injectors on my car?
No!
Definitely not! Not unless your engine is making power in the 400+ HP
range! See our follow-up questions below for more details. This is the most commonly made mistake in hot-rodding!
It's just like the old carburetor days when misinformed hot-rodders
thought "bigger was better" and a they all thought bigger carb was just what they
needed! Naturally, a bigger carb or bigger jets than the engine
required only made them lose power and pour black smoke from the unburnt
fuel out their tailpipes! Of course, all the retailers loved to sell more carbs, and
that's the same thing all over again with injectors. To understand
this, you really have to understand some fundamentals of how fuel
injection works.
Very
simply, a fuel injector is like the nozzle on your water hose. This
injector, like your water nozzle, has a certain flow rate which depends on
the fuel (water) pressure behind it. More pressure makes more flow
of course, up to a certain point, beyond which the flow just becomes
erratic. This will be explained in more detail in the next
question.
The
amount of fuel an injector will deliver depends on three things: The
flow rate of the injector (i.e. the "size" of the injector), the
amount of pressure behind it, and the length of time the injector is
turned on. This injector "on time" is referred to as BPW
(Base Pulse Width), measured in ms (milliseconds). In a production
car, the first two items are set. Those of you with adjustable fuel
pressure regulators can obviously tweak the pressure. The PCM
(computer) is calibrated with a set injector flow rate in mind based on
the production fuel pressure. The MAF is measuring the amount of air
flowing into the engine in terms of mass (in grams per second), and if it
has not been altered, this measurement is very accurate. The PCM
determines the optimum AF (air-fuel) ratio to deliver. (This AF
ratio will be discussed in more detail in another question too.) So
these are the known variables: the amount of air being ingested into the
engine, the commanded AF ratio (which as we've previously discussed, is
optimized for the conditions.). Also known is the flow rate of the
injectors under the production factory fuel pressure. This is a
calibrated variable inside the PCM, and no, it has not been altered from
the factory setting even if you've got one of those "off the
shelf" recalibrated PCMs.
Based
on these known parameters, the PCM can calculate how long to open the
injectors (the BPW) to spray exactly the right amount of fuel, given the
airflow, to achieve the target AF ratio. So, your enemy here is
TIME. The amount of time you have to spray fuel is limited to the
time between consecutive intake valve openings, so at higher RPMs, you
have less time to spray fuel.
The
ONLY time you need to step up the injector size is when you're out of
time, where the engine is ingesting more air than the injectors can handle
for a given fuel pressure. If the engine is truly ingesting enough
air so that the injector cannot turn on long enough to spray the necessary
amount of fuel, you need higher flow injectors!
Check
out the following questions and answers for more details concerning
injector sizing.
6. What is
the injector size on the L67 engines, and how much HP can they support?
The production injector for
all L67 engines is calibrated from the factory as a 36 lb/hour (4.6 g/sec)
injector. A very rough formula to determine the power level a
injector can support is simply to divide the total flowrate of all the
injectors (6 in this case) by the BSFC (Brake Specific Fuel
Consumption). If we conservatively estimate our BSFC at an
inefficient 0.6 lb/hr/HP, six 36 lb/hr injectors will provide 216 lb/hr of
total flow, so this indicates they can support up to 360 HP. A more realistic BSFC is 0.5 lb/hr/HP (our engines are a bit
more efficient than 0.6!), which indicates our stock injectors can support
up to 432 HP! Actual engine dyno testing has shown that the
BSFC of our engines is between 0.35 and 0.4, meaning the stock 36 lb/hr
(4.6 g/sec) injectors can theoretically support between 540 to 617 HP!
As an aside, our GSX engine
which dynoed a conservative 309 at the wheels (that's 370 at the engine taking into
account a 20% loss through the transmission) is still using the stock
injectors. Other stock components include: fuel pump, fuel pressure
regulator, throttle body, spark plug wires and ignition coils.
 |
Here is an actual dyno
run demonstrating the low BSFC numbers these 3800 engines operate
at. Note the stock fuel injectors & BSFC is as low as
0.35!
Engine: 3800 Series II
Block, Crank, Pistons, Rods, fuel injectors, spark plug cables,
ignition system: Stock Production L67 3800 Series II Supercharged
Cam Grind: Experimental
Heads: Ported with large valves
Intercooled |
7. You've
mentioned injector on time, or BPW (Base Pulse Width). What's the
max number?
As
mentioned before, BPW is the time in msec the injector is turned on.
Obviously, this time is limited to the time between consecutive intake
valve openings, or combustion events, on the same cylinder, and varies
with engine RPM. This is easily calculated, and a table is shown
below:
| RPM |
1600 |
2400 |
3200 |
4000 |
4400 |
4800 |
5200 |
5600 |
6000 |
6400 |
| Max BPW (msec) |
75 |
50 |
37.5 |
30 |
27.27 |
25 |
23 |
21.4 |
20 |
18.75 |
What does this mean? If
you're seeing BPW less than any of those max numbers at those RPMs, guess
what - your injectors have some headroom left. That is, if more fuel
was required, the PCM is able to command additional on-time out of your
injectors to get more fuel. If you're seeing BPW reaching or
exceeding those max numbers, and you've increased fuel pressure up to the
maximum reasonable level, and all other indications are that you're still
not able to run the correct AF ratio (see question #4 above), you need
larger injectors.
Now,
there is a general rule of thumb that you size the injectors so that
they're large enough so that they only have to work at up to 80 or 90%
capacity at most. This is true, because if you size the injector to
it's limits so that it's turned on all the time (that's referred to as
being "static", meaning they never get a chance to turn off
because the next cylinder event comes around where the injector is
commanded open again before they ever are commanded to turn off) it can
eventually overheat the injector and cause durability concerns. But,
this does not mean that you can not command a injector to have more than a
80% duty cycle - you can, and you will get more fuel above 80% duty
cycle. In fact, the production 86-87 Buick Grand National ran the
injectors static at WOT (wide open throttle). It's just not
recommended if you can help it.
So
does this mean you should put bigger injectors on your L67 just to be on
the safe side to avoid running the duty cycle above 80%? Well, only
if you can get a custom PCM calibration to provide the correct injector
flow value! Read on to the next question for more details.
8. So what's going to happen if I stick bigger injectors on my GTP right now?
Well,
if you just stick them in, and don't adjust anything else, you'll probably
pour black smoke out the tailpipe and run slower. Remember, the PCM
has an injector flow rate variable inside it that tells it what the flow
rate of the injector is, and that needs to be changed if you put in larger
injectors.
Here are the scenarios
of all the possibilities when you put in larger injectors:
1.
Your MAF was reading way too little air, so the PCM was calculating a
small BPW and you were running lean. You stick in larger injectors,
the BPW calculation remains the same, but the injectors flow more fuel, so
you end up running ok. Note that you could have accomplished the
same thing if you just increased the fuel pressure on the stock injectors.
2.
Your MAF was reading accurately or maybe too much air. In this case,
the BPW remains the same with the larger injectors, and now you're
flooding the engine with too much fuel. In this case, your only
choice is to reduce the fuel pressure and bring the fuel delivery back to
normal, or remove the bigger injectors and go back to the correct stock
ones.
3. You
really are putting out more than 400 HP, your MAF is accurate but you're
flowing so much air that the injectors are running static and still not
supplying enough fuel, and you've increased the fuel pressure as much as
reasonable. In this case, sticking in larger injectors will give you
more fuel for the same BPW.
4. You've stuck in larger injectors, but the fuel trim variables have compensated for the larger injectors and
brought
everything back to normal, negating the additional fuel flow from the
injectors by decreasing the time they are turned on to deliver fuel.
(decrease in BPW)
In
all cases, except for #4, we're ignoring one very important thing, and
that is this: the PCM was never correctly recalibrated for the
larger injectors. This means that under part throttle cruising
operation, the injectors will be delivering much more fuel than normal
under the same BPW, and therefore the fuel trim will quickly learn this
and decrease the BPW to compensate, thus negating any benefits of having a
larger injector!
The only correct way to even try to run larger injectors is to change the injector
flow rate constant parameter in the PCM. Otherwise, your results
will be random and the fuel trim will simply compensate for the larger
injectors.
9.
But I've seen / heard about this GTP owner that swears he's
running faster with larger injectors. How's he doing this?
Again,
he'll fall into one of the above 4 cases or some combination, and more
than likely, he'll probably run just as good or even better if stock
injectors were put back in.
Our best
advice is to have a correctly calibrated MAF that accurately measures
airflow. Once you have this, there is absolutely no need for
adjusting the fuel pressure from the factory setting, or increasing the
injector size (as long as you're making less than 400 HP).
Again,
we should point out that our GSX engine which dynoed 309 at the wheels
(that's 370 at the engine taking into account a 20% loss through the
transmission) is still using the stock injectors, stock fuel pump, fuel
pressure regulator, throttle body, spark plug wires and ignition coils.
10.
I hear a lot about knock or detonation or pre-ignition. What is this,
and why is it so bad?
Knock, can be extremely damaging to an engine if
uncontrolled. It should not be confused with pre-ignition, which is a
different phenomenon. Most current automotive engines are 4 cycle spark-ignition (Otto) engines,
so we'll refer to this type of engine exclusively. We'll also assume
the reader is familiar with the main components of a internal combustion
engine and how the 4 cycles operate, and what spark advance means.
The rate at which an
air/fuel mixture burns is a combination of flame speed and combustion chamber geometry. For best efficiency and torque, peak cylinder pressure/greatest heat release
should occur 5-10 degrees ATDC, so spark timing must be adjusted to compensate for different burn rates at different engine speeds and loads.
A fundamental means of increasing engine performance and efficiency is increasing static compression ratio
(CR), or using a blower and artificially forcing the compression ratio
higher. One obstacle to further increases in boost or CR is engine knock.
Even today the details of knock are not well defined - it is an extremely complicated combination of chemical and physical abnormal combustion phenomena.
The
textbook definition of knock is this: “The explosive spontaneous ignition of fuel-air mixture ahead of the normal propagating flame and the subsequent cylinder pressure oscillations in homogeneous-charge spark ignition engines.”
 |
|
Under normal
combustion, the flame front propagates very smoothly in a uniform
manner. |
So happens differently when
detonation occurs?
As with
normal combustion, abnormal combustion begins in a similar fashion. Ignition occurs at the spark plug, causing combustion,
and cylinder pressure and temperature increases as the piston moves up and the air-fuel mixture is burned.
Under certain conditions, the unburned mixture ahead of the flame front (end gas) is auto-ignited due to rising pressure and temperature.
This auto-ignited end gas explodes before the flamefront arrives, with a resulting violent rise in pressure.
These propagating waves then exceed the speed of sound, and a characteristic audible “knock” or “ping” is heard. If uncontrolled, excessive knock is extremely damaging to internal engine components,
such as pistons.
Spark-induced knock should not be confused with Pre-ignition. Pre-ignition is ignition of the fuel-air mixture before the timed spark event, usually caused by surface ignition emanating from hot spots.
Detonation occurs when the fuel-air mixture burns too fast, independent of the time it is ignited.
Therefore Detonation will generally accompany pre-ignition, although the reverse is not necessarily true. Knock is the sonic concussion resulting from either pre-ignition or detonation.
11. So how is knock or detonation controlled? What
is Knock Retard?
There are many methods of suppressing knock - the
knock control system in the L36 and L67 accomplishes this by retarding spark timing, the most practical and effective dynamic method.
Spark knock occurs at specific frequencies determined by the combustion chamber geometry,
and always occurs in a specific time window after the peak cylinder pressure point. The knock control system must correctly differentiate between normal engine noise and true knock, and correctly retard spark timing only enough to eliminate this knock
Every engine/trans combo in a particular platform will have a certain
characteristic sonic signature. The general engine noise of the pistons
and valvetrain have their own characteristics, and the sonic signature of
knock is very distinctive as well. The engine is mapped out via
accelerometers and spectrum analyzers to determine the best practical
location to locate a knock sensor, where the signal to noise (SN) ratio of
knock to base engine noise is best. A particular knock sensor
(Piezoelectric resonant in the case of these engines) of the right
characteristics is chosen, generally one whose resonant frequency is
compatible with the center frequency of that engines knock. In the case
of these 3800s, two 6kHz sensor is used. This knock sensor hears knock
and engine vibrations, and provides a voltage input to the knock control
system. The knock control system inside the PCM then processes this
signal, determines whether it's real detonation or noise, and retards the
ignition timing the proper amount to suppress this knock. This is the
knock retard (in degrees) that is being referred to on the scan tool.
This
knock control system also learns, much like the fuel trim does. So if
you've run some cheap gas or switched to a small pulley and your engine has
been knocking quite a bit, the system will learn the spark advance lower to
protect the engine, giving you decreased performance. This of course,
can affect your track times. How can you "unlearn" this
spark retard? Disconnect the battery power for an hour or so, or put
in some good gas which won't knock, and drive it fairly hard for 10 minutes
or so, spending as much time in a high load state, but without any knock
being detected. If any knock is being detected, you're wasting your
time as it's probably just learning deeper into the retard!
12.
Why
can't I just run smaller and smaller pulleys and keep increasing boost,
and therefore, power?
Pulleys
less than 3 inches in diameter has not proven beneficial in testing.
The high terminal speed reached by the blower as the engine spins to
redline (6000 rpm) really start beating the air and generating excessive
heat, enough heat that even an air to liquid intercooler is not capable of
reducing the heat to an acceptable level. Another major problem at
these extreme engine (and therefore, blower) speeds is belt slippage, as
it is nearly impossible to prevent the belt from slipping at these
speeds. The smaller the pulley, the more the torque band is shifted
towards the lower engine speeds, giving you incredible low end torque, but
sacrificing the HP at the upper engine speeds. Small pulleys are
great for doing smoky burnouts, but don't win races due to the loss in
upper RPM power.
| These are dyno runs made
with three pulley sizes. Notice the decrease in boost as the
engine speeds increase, indicating belt slippage. Also note
the excessively high air temperatures before the intercooler
(T1). |
|

2.4 inch pulley
|

2.6 inch pulley
|

2.8 inch pulley
|
Legalize
All materials contained in the Thrasher-EP.com
or Thrashercharged.com Web
site at http://www.Thrasher-EP.com/ and http://www.thrashercharged.com are copyright © 1996-2003 Thrasher
Engineered Performance, LLC. The content presented herein may not under
any circumstances be distributed in any way or form without prior written
permission from Thrasher Engineered Performance, LLC.
Prior Written Permission
This paragraph represents prior written permission for
third parties to distribute specific content from Thrasher-EP.com, namely
the FAQ-Frequently Asked Questions posted in the Thrasher-EP.com or
thrashercharged.com FAQ section. Permission to distribute this content is granted
under the following terms:
(1) The content must remain in its original form, but
may be modified slightly to reflect a specific powertrain setup. (2) The
content must include the following text with a hyperlink to the
Thrasher-EP.com or thrashercharged.com Web site: "This content is used by permission from the
Thrashercharged.com Web site. Copyright © 1996-2003 Thrasher Engineered
Performance, LLC. All rights reserved." (3) You may print and distribute
the content in paper form under the same terms. (4) The content must be
distributed only to your direct customers, students, or employees. (5) The
content may not be distributed for profit. If you are a commercial entity,
you can still distribute the content, but you may not charge any fees for
it.
|